Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-07 22:09:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > What about the *.txt extension?  Do we want that or remove it?  I would
> > prefer its removal.
> I agreed with the point about making those files easily editable.
> I'm not dead set on it, but I don't see what we gain by not having
> the .txt there --- we still have to document a different file name
> and different location than is the case on Unix.

My feeling is that the *.txt is actually misleading because people will
think of it as a file full of freeform text (paragraphs) and not a
configuration file.

Does anyone know of a configuration file that uses *.txt?  I don't. 

Perhaps there is another extension that is good for Win32 but i don't
think *.txt is it.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-07 22:19:18
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-07 18:55:25
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Initdb failing for no apparent reason in 8.0.0beta4 on windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group