Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-07 16:03:50
Message-ID: 26409.1105113830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What about the *.txt extension? Do we want that or remove it? I would
> prefer its removal.

I agreed with the point about making those files easily editable.
I'm not dead set on it, but I don't see what we gain by not having
the .txt there --- we still have to document a different file name
and different location than is the case on Unix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-07 16:05:38 Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous Message T.J. 2005-01-07 15:51:32 Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..