Re: code question: storing INTO relation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Date: 2004-11-12 23:28:02
Message-ID: 200411122328.iACNS2l10369@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Greg Stark wrote:
> >> I think that's already done for CREATE INDEX/REINDEX.
>
> > I don't think so. Can someone confirm?
>
> Greg is correct --- at least for btree build, which is the only index
> type we have WAL-ified at all :-(

OK, TODO updated:

* Eliminate WAL logging for CREATE TABLE AS when not doing WAL
archiving

FYI, we do have a TODO for the other index methods:

* Add WAL index reliability improvement to non-btree indexes

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-11-12 23:40:40 Re: 8.0 press release
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-11-12 23:18:46 Re: 8.0 press release