Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB)

Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> > > If the solution is to just write a little client that uses perl
> > > DBI to fetch rows one at a time and write them out, that's doable,
> > > but it would be nice if psql could be made to "just work" without
> > > the monster RSS.
> >
> > It wouldn't make a difference unless that driver implements the
> > underlying protocol on its own.
>
> Even though we can tell people to make use of cursors, it seems that
> memory usage for large result sets should be addressed. A quick search of
> the archives does not reveal any discussion about having libpq spill to
> disk if a result set reaches some threshold. Has this been canvassed in
> the past?

No, I don't remember hearing this discussed and I don't think most
people would want libpq spilling to disk by default.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073