Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org?
Date: 2004-10-31 21:12:07
Message-ID: 20041031171023.I33702@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


I just email'd Alexey to test after making some changes (moving the whole
VM to a faster server) and reporting much better response times ...

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Alexey Borzov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> That's why mirrors are pulled from http://www.postgresql.org, nor are they
>> pulled using what I'd guess you are using ( wget? ) below, but using rsync
>> ... hasn't been for years now ...
>>
>> In fact, over the next little while, http://www.postgresql.org will
>> actually be pointing to an RR DNS entry, and not even the 'base server' ...
>> I've just gotta sit down and update the DNS generation scripts for this ...
>
> Uh, seems I was unclear about what I was doing.
>
> I understand of course that the site is mirrored via rsync, but consider the
> following: the site which resides in CVS is just a few PHP scripts, to have
> something to rsync you first need to *generate* the static pages. And here
> comes the problem: page generation is outrageously slow.
>
> In current version special scripts are used to generate static pages, but
> these are terrible hacks, f.e. you have to make the same change to design
> both in the dynamic page and the mirroring script. But they maybe run in
> acceptable time, I don't know, ask Dave.
>
> For the next version I just wrote a generic mirroring script behaving like
> wget but taking into account some specific needs (like i18n). The plus is
> that you don't need to change this script *at all* if you add pages or even
> completely redesign the site.
>
> But now it looks as if generation of full static website will take several
> hours. And no, this has nothing to do with network latency, the mirror
> generation script was run locally.
>
> Marc, page generation times of 3+ seconds are only acceptable if you do some
> extremely complex database queries in them, think reports. This is definitely
> *not* the case with the code of postgresql.org, my experience tells me that
> modern hardware can happily churn 5-10 of such pages *per second*. Thus:
> either hardware is completely inadequate or the servers are overloaded.
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-10-31 21:22:41 Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org?
Previous Message Alexey Borzov 2004-10-31 20:26:26 Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org?