Re: All three packages ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: All three packages ...
Date: 2004-08-19 15:17:00
Message-ID: 20040819121610.D82455@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Nope, and I even checked jdbc to make sure nothing go screwed up with the
moves post-7.3, and its there also ... and 7.2 *appears* to be okay size
wise ...

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> I never got any feedback on v7.3.7's packaging, so I'm guessing that it
>> looked okay to everyone, even though it was substantially smaller?
>
> Devrim pointed out yesterday that it seemed to be missing
> contrib/earthdistance; that's not enough to explain the size diff
> though.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-19 15:19:38 Re: All three packages ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-19 15:02:09 Re: All three packages ...