Re: Two Flyers

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two Flyers
Date: 2004-07-11 02:06:50
Message-ID: 200407110206.i6B26os11263@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday 10 July 2004 14:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > Our upcoming 6.5 release marks the development team's final
> > > mastery of the source code we inherited from Berkeley.
>
> > That phrase is even in our release notes:
> > This release marks a major step in the development team's mastery of
> > the source code we inherited from Berkeley.
>
> Not the same phrase, and the second one, in the release notes, doesn't sound
> arrogant at all. It's the 'final' portion that caught my eyebrow....
>
> > and, yes, it was me who wrote that. Many felt it was embarrasing to
> > admit we didn't have full understanding of all the PostgreSQL modules
> > before 6.5, but it was the truth, so if you thought it was arrogant, I
> > must have struck the right balance.
>
> Some balance... But, yes, I was lurking the lists at the time and I remember
> some of the comments. The mastery has certainly increased since then. But
> 'final mastery' is somewhat an asymptotic goal, no?

Yes, "final" mastery wasn't my wording. Not even sure if that makes
sense in this context.

> The release notes have the right balance, because they leave room for the
> (realized) improvements since 6.5. I look forward to the next five years,
> given the strides that have been made in the last five.
>
> > The Sloney elephant looks like he has an attitude, though. :-)
>
> Hmmm, just now noticed that. My preference is the 'slonik' one; the Slony one
> looks as if one has angered him/her.
>
> But the PostGIS one takes the prize. Talk about World Domination...

Ah, yes, very cute.

I think maybe we should make our catch phrase:

Fortress PostgreSQL: The Bomb

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-11 02:15:42 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2004-07-11 01:53:04 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant