Re: threads stuff/UnixWare

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: threads stuff/UnixWare
Date: 2004-05-12 18:02:30
Message-ID: 20040512150142.U35531@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote:

>
>
> --On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 14:14:30 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >
> >> I'd LIKE to be able to have PG wrappers for those functions, and have
> >> the first invocation of them look via dlsym() for the real ones, and if
> >> they are NOT there, use fake functions that assume we are NOT threaded.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be easier to have a #define?
> >
> > Correct me if I'm wrong here, but the problem is that we are expecting
> > thread functinos to be called x_, while Unixware defines them as pthread_,
> > right? so make Unixware specific #defines that map x_ to pthread_ ...
> No, we are expecting them to have pthread_*.
>
> On UnixWare, to get the pthread_* functions, you need to invoke a compiler
> option (-Kpthread), to cause libpthread to be linked in.
>
> Since libpq.so now REQUIRES the function, we need to either:
>
> 1) force ANY program that uses libpq to be compiled/linked with -Kpthread

Ummm, shouldn't that be added to the port specific Makefile?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-05-12 18:05:06 Re: Probably security hole in postgresql-7.4.1
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-05-12 17:43:41 Parser change needed?