From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Date: | 2004-05-04 13:17:18 |
Message-ID: | 20040504131718.GC2417@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 09:03:03AM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> If a feature freeze is made on August 1st or even later it would be ok
> because nobody is doing major database changes in summer anyway.
You seem to forget that half of the world is not in summer on August
1st. I admit that 90% of the developers are not on _this_ half of the
world though ;-) My point is that not necessarily development will stop
at that time. Moreover, if there is nobody to test the beta, what good
does to have a feature freeze?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Just treat us the way you want to be treated + some extra allowance
for ignorance." (Michael Brusser)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-05-04 13:25:40 | Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-04 13:12:19 | Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior |