Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning
Date: 2004-04-28 00:00:02
Message-ID: 20040428000002.GV41429@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Another idea would be to provide some means to roll a database forwards
and backwards. If you're doing a recovery because you did something like
an accidental UPDATE SET field = blah without a where clause, what you
really care about is going up to the point right before that update. If
there's a log viewer with enough detail, that would suffice; otherwise
you'd need to test for some specific condition.

Of course timestamps would still be useful in this scenario since they
can get you close to the transaction in question.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-04-28 00:00:03 Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib,
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-04-27 23:45:33 Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib,