Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?
Date: 2004-04-20 03:46:57
Message-ID: 200404200346.i3K3kvw28144@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers


Not sure if anyone reported to you but we fixed these in current CVS and
will have the fix in 7.4.3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cott Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 16:25, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Sure, shoot them over to hackers or patches. The pg_autovacuum author
> > is looking into this.
>
> Here they are. They've worked well for me, but someone wiser in the ways
> of C should certainly look them over. :)
>
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dinar 2004-04-20 04:55:38 Record type and ROW type in pl/pgsql functions
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-04-20 00:57:47 Re: BUG #1139: Auto-increment and Rollback

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-04-20 03:50:02 Re: Postgresql snapshots broken?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-20 02:02:39 Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?