Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-20 02:02:39
Message-ID: 200404200202.i3K22d610749@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

L J Bayuk wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > ...
> > OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl. I just removed the docs for them.
> >
> > Can someone comment on pgtclsh? The README says:
> >...
> >
> > Do we need to move that over to gborg? If so, you can pull it out of
> > 7.4 CVS.
> >
> > Anyone?
>
> Already discussed:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
> and
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

Great. Thanks you.

I heard it wasn't needed, but couldn't remember if that was current
information or something old.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-20 03:46:57 Re: [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?
Previous Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2004-04-20 01:58:02 Position available at the Telegraph project

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Owens, Steve 2004-04-20 16:39:11 Calling SQL functions from ECPG
Previous Message L J Bayuk 2004-04-20 01:40:36 Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?