Re: Update on PITR

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Date: 2004-04-01 03:25:37
Message-ID: 20040331232457.F91030@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
>
> What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL? Last time I heard they weren't
> interested in their database product anymore. Why do they care about
> the PostgreSQL project?

Just speculation, but I'd go with end goal being to be able to dump Oracle
altogether, once PostgreSQL actually has all the various enterprise
features ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-04-01 03:27:56 Re: Best open source db poll currently
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-01 03:04:59 Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql 2004-04-01 04:00:05 GUID
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-01 02:50:21 Re: Update on PITR

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2004-04-01 19:42:05 Re: Update on PITR
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-01 02:50:21 Re: Update on PITR