Re: Update on PITR

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on PITR
Date: 2004-04-01 02:50:21
Message-ID: 200404010250.i312oLu20676@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
>
> What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL? Last time I heard they weren't
> interested in their database product anymore. Why do they care about
> the PostgreSQL project?
>
> Of course, it's awesome that they are - but why? What's their plan?
>

SRA wants PITR too, as does everyone else. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-01 02:56:29 Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-04-01 01:22:35 Re: Update on PITR

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-04-01 03:25:37 Re: Update on PITR
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-04-01 01:22:35 Re: Update on PITR

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-04-01 03:25:37 Re: Update on PITR
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-04-01 01:22:35 Re: Update on PITR