Re: Log rotation

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Date: 2004-03-12 20:29:40
Message-ID: 20040312202940.GA9345@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 15:19:29 -0500,
Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> >I can see their problem with making a dependency to all of apache or
> >including
> >multilog in their distribution. But they probably could include something
> >that is only a logger either using some project that is only a logger or
> >splitting out the logger that is bundled with apache. Then it wouldn't
> >be unreasonable to make a dependency for postgres requiring that logging
> >rpm. Other services could also make use of this logging package as well.
> >
>
> Yes that would be nice. I have no idea how difficult it would be to
> extricate the logrotate program from Apache. I also don't know if there
> would be any license restrictions, would we be able to redistribute it as
> an independently package? I don't know the answer.

I was suggesting this as something a distro maintainer (such as Redhat)
could do. I think that the postgres developers shouldn't be spending
time doing this. They should be just suggesting some possibilities
in the admin part of the documentation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-12 23:20:49 Stability of planner estimates given multiple redundant clauses
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2004-03-12 20:21:57 Re: Log rotation