| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Date: | 2004-03-11 23:24:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20040311232420.GI39391@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:14:10PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> So far, only 4 people, total, have expressed opinons on the matter. I'm
> throwing this on Hackers so that members of projects we will be hosting can
> indicate whether they:
>
> A) Favor www.postgresql.net
> B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org
> C) Don't care as long as the porting is relatively painless.
I'm not crazy about the name pgfoundry, but otherwise I think it's the
better choice. The "www." problem could be circumvented by renaming the
project, perhaps, but I think it's best to keep a distinction between
"Postres, the database" and "related projects."
Jeroen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-11 23:36:19 | Re: Default Stats Revisited |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-11 23:19:55 | Re: pgFoundry |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 00:01:47 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-11 23:19:55 | Re: pgFoundry |