From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch |
Date: | 2004-03-09 23:27:50 |
Message-ID: | 200403092327.i29NRol05525@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, do you know how many of these issue are still open?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> The IPv6 patch seems to still be a few bricks shy of a load. Grepping
> for places that handle AF_INET but not AF_INET6 revealed these
> unimplemented features:
>
> 1. IDENT authorization. Fails if either local or remote address is IPv6.
>
> 2. SSL. Postmaster allows SSL for AF_INET but not AF_INET6.
>
> 3. Client address display in backend's ps display seems to be v4 only.
>
> 4. pgstat code can only bind to 127.0.0.1 (v4 loopback). On a v6-only
> machine this would not exist, would it?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-03-09 23:34:36 | Re: Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-09 23:20:15 | Re: PITR Functional Design v2 for 7.5 |