Re: Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?
Date: 2004-03-09 23:34:36
Message-ID: 20040309152612.F7528@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Bill Moran wrote:

> Am I missing something here?
>
> agelis=# select B'1'::int;
> int4
> ------
> 1
> (1 row)
>
> agelis=# select 1::bit;
> bit
> -----
> 0
> (1 row)
>
> agelis=# select B'1'=1;
> ?column?
> ----------
> f
> (1 row)
>
> Last I checked, binary 1 and integer 1 were equal. Is this a bug, or is there
> a reason for this that I need educated on? Why does int 1 cast to binary 0?

Hmm, on my 7.4 machine, I get an error saying that there's no = operator
for bit and integer. If I cast the B'1' into an integer I get a true
result.

The reason for 1::bit being 0 is that int4 -> bit(n) casts cast to a 32
bit bit string. IIRC, when bit strings are truncated for size in casts,
the spec says to take from the left.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-09 23:43:58 Re: Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2004-03-09 23:22:48 Re: C locale

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-09 23:43:58 Re: Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-09 23:27:50 Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch