Re: simple make check failures

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jonathan Scott <jwscott(at)vanten(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: simple make check failures
Date: 2004-03-02 20:08:22
Message-ID: 200403022008.i22K8MB00891@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jonathan Scott <jwscott(at)vanten(dot)com> writes:
> > I checked my system, and bison is reporting itself as 1.875. I am using SuSE 9.0, and I did have to upgrade to get that configuration message to go away, AND to make it compile.
>
> > Could you recommend a way I could get bison to reproduce that message?
>
> If you did just upgrade bison, I'd suggest "make maintainer-clean" and
> then rebuild. I do not think the Postgres makefiles are able to detect
> that you installed a new bison, so they won't automatically re-run bison
> to build new output files. We normally ship the bison output files as
> part of distribution tarballs, which is why "make clean" or even "make
> distclean" doesn't flush 'em.

I have updated the text warning about too-old bison to be clearer when
it is a problem:

! *** If you are going to modify the lexer files or build from CVS, the installed
! *** version of Bison is too old. Bison version 1.875 or later is required.])

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-03-02 20:44:38 Re: IN and ANY
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-02 18:45:21 Re: [GENERAL] select statement against pg_stats returns