Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 20:28:44
Message-ID: 200402261228.44788.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Peter,

> So yes, I
> think this is a reasonable plan, just don't expect "collaboration" to
> suddenly appear out of nowhere.

Yeah. As my grandfather used to say, "You can lead a horse to water, but you
can't make him shrink." (granddad is under care, now).

Everyone: Further data: if we prefer BugZilla to GForge's lighter-weight bug
tracking, it turns out that there is a BZ plug-in for GForge.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-26 20:32:05 Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 20:28:22 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-02-26 20:38:47 Re: ORDER BY different locales
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 20:28:22 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-26 20:41:26 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 20:28:22 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Costa 2004-02-26 20:31:17 Upgraded Site..any news ?
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 20:28:22 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal