Re: IMPORTANT: A temporary list for Strategic

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: A temporary list for Strategic
Date: 2004-01-10 08:27:41
Message-ID: 200401101357.41341.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Saturday 10 January 2004 05:38, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I do think that our chronic lack of focussed discussions on this list is
> certainly not helping move PostgreSQL advocacy forwards.

That remains debatable but let's not get into that.

> So, therefore: we will hash out the "sales message" issues on this list,
> and then I will forward a summary to Rob. OK with everyone?

I would suggest we assing point of contact for each major commercial helper.
That way it would channel the efforts as appropriate and would not expose a
commercial entitty to create chaos that such lists are.

What say?

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2004-01-10 12:36:06 Re: psql \d option list overloaded
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-01-10 05:09:27 Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary