Re: hardware requirements under Redhat

From: Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>
To: kevin07(at)optonline(dot)net (kbd)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hardware requirements under Redhat
Date: 2003-12-24 23:02:40
Message-ID: 200312242302.hBON2fXY002400@gw.tssi.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Use RAID 5 or 0+1...
> I have had the Mirroring vs RAID 5 debate before.
> You would go with RAID 5 to obtain the fault tolerance.
>
> That was my first choice but I was told I was wrong.

I doubt there is a general rule as to which is better, it will depend
upon the individual circumstances (including budget).

Were you told why that was the wrong choice?
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-12-24 23:46:24 Re: [webmaster] Mirrors that don't suck.
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2003-12-24 22:48:19 Re: Installing Postgres w/RH9