Re: 2-phase commit

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-09-29 03:56:00
Message-ID: 20030929005440.Y632@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
>
> [At participant(master)'s side]
> Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
>
> [At coordinator(slave)' side]
> 1) After a while
> 2) re-establish the communication path between the
> partcipant(master)'s TM.
> 3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
> 1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
> the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
>
> If there's no objection from you, I would assume I'm right.

'K, but what happens if the slave never gets a 'commit ok'? Does the
slave keep trying ad nausem?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-29 04:02:48 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-09-29 03:48:48 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)