Re: State of Beta 2

From: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>
To: PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-17 08:45:36
Message-ID: 200309171045.36455.kar@kakidata.dk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> If someone is willing to pony up 2000.00 per month for a period of at
>> least 6 months, I will dedicated one of my programmers to the task.

I stated the "how much will it cost" question, but I'm beginning to think that
it's the wrong approach. From the answers in this thread I do believe that it
will be an eternal chase with almost certainty of errors.

Some people have claimed that the big commercial databases don't change their
on-disk represantation anymore. Maybe PostgreSQL could try to aim for this
goal. At least try to get the on-disk changes ready for 7.5 - with or without
the functionality to use it. I think that any pg_* table changes could be
done with a small and efficient pg_upgrade.

Big items that will change the way PostgreSQL stores its data would be
Tablespaces
PITR
...
More ?

I know it's not possible to tell the future, but if Oracle is steady,
shouldn't it be possible?

How do other Open Source systems do ? MySQL (or maybe better: InnoDB),
FireBird ??

--
Kaare Rasmussen --Linux, spil,-- Tlf: 3816 2582
Kaki Data tshirts, merchandize Fax: 3816 2501
Howitzvej 75 Åben 12.00-18.00 Email: kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk
2000 Frederiksberg Lørdag 12.00-16.00 Web: www.suse.dk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Moore-Oliva 2003-09-17 08:46:11 Problems requiring a GROUP BY clause on update?
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2003-09-17 08:13:10 Re: State of Beta 2