From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Date: | 2003-09-13 03:03:33 |
Message-ID: | 1460.1063422213@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> writes:
> Is the Itanium tas implementation correct?
FWIW, this evening I did a few dozen iterations of "make check" parallel
regression tests on a 4-way Itanium box at Red Hat's Toronto office,
working from CVS-tip sources. No sign of problems. That's not a proof
of correctness, of course, but it does give me some confidence ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-13 04:08:05 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-13 00:49:55 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-13 04:08:05 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-13 02:51:33 | Re: tsearch pfree error |