Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

Tom,

> No. I want to know what the subordinate does when it's promised to
> commit and the co-ordinator never responds. AFAICS the subordinate
> is screwed --- it can't commit, and it can't abort, and it can't expect
> to make progress indefinitely on other work while it's holding locks
> for the not-quite-committed transaction.

AFAIK, MS SQL Server's two-phase commit works like this ... if both servers
prepare, and one crashes, the transaction is screwed up. Somewhat unreliable
considering the frequence with which MSSQL crashes, yet it seems to be good
enough for several companies to sell "solutions" based on it. (performance is
also appalling, but that's a different issue)

Anybody have a grasp of Oracle internals for 2PC?

Anyway, I would vote for a first implemenation for 2PC which addressed the
commit-then-crash issue in some expedient-but-not-reliable way, and putting
2PC in /contrib with a "not for production use" warning. Some people will
use it in production anyway, and hopefully one or more of them will put in
the dozens of hours required to make it reliable.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco