| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Ben Clewett <B(dot)Clewett(at)roadrunner(dot)uk(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") |
| Date: | 2003-04-17 15:37:46 |
| Message-ID: | 200304171537.h3HFbkW19947@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> > - They have extensive backup support. Including now,
> > concurrent backup
> > without user interuption or risk of inconsistency.
>
> So does PostgreSQL (pg_dump/pg_dumpall).
I have applied the following doc patch to the pg_dump documentation to
more clearly state that it can do consistent backups during concurrent
access --- too many people weren't seeing that capability.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 4.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-04-17 16:37:55 | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-04-17 15:26:20 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2 |