Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: eric soroos <eric-psql(at)soroos(dot)net>
Cc: Shankar K <shan0075(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jeffrey D(dot)Brower" <jeff(at)pointhere(dot)net>
Subject: Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
Date: 2003-04-01 18:26:02
Message-ID: 200304011826.h31IQ2S29201@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

eric soroos wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:39:17 -0800 (PST) in message
> <20030401173917(dot)19476(dot)qmail(at)web21101(dot)mail(dot)yahoo(dot)com>, Shankar
> K <shan0075(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> > hi jeff,
> >
> > go to
> > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/docs/momjian/hw_performance/
> > under 'filesystems' slide.
> >
>
> I suspect that is what he's seen.
>
> >From my experience, ext3 is only a percent or two slower than ext2 under pg_bench. It saves an amazing amount of time on startup after a failure by not having to fsck to confirm that the filesystem is in a consistent state.
>
> I believe that ext3 is a metadata journaling system, and not a
> data journaling system. This would indicate that the PG
> transactioning is complimentary to the filesystem journaling,
> not duplication.

Ext3 is only metadata journaling if you set the mount flags as
described. I also don't think pgbench is the best test for testing file
system performance.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Buchan 2003-04-01 19:31:13 Postgresql performance on Solaris
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-04-01 17:55:19 Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3