Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
Date: 2003-04-01 17:55:19
Message-ID: 20030401175519.GA9553@mail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 12:33:15PM -0500, Jeffrey D. Brower wrote:
> What is the URL of that article? I understood that ext2 was faster with PG
> and so I went to a lot of trouble of creating an ext2 partition just for PG
> and gave up the journalling to do that. Something about double effort since
> PG already does a lot of that.

I don't know how ext3 could be faster than ext2, since it has to do
more work.

But ext2 is not crash-safe. So your data could well be hosed if you
come back from a crash on ext2.

Actually, I have my doubts about _any_ of the journaling filesystems
for Linux: ext3 has a reputation for being slow if you journal in the
real-safe mode, and there have been so many unrepeatable reiserfs
problem reports that I'm loathe to use it for real systems. I had
exceptionally good experiences with xfs when I was admining SGI
boxes, but that's not part of the standard Linux kernel distribution,
and with no idea why, I think my managers would get grumpy with me
for using it.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-01 18:26:02 Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-01 17:54:45 Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3