| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON |
| Date: | 2003-03-22 04:47:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20030322124722.N61920-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
How can it recurse, actually - there won't be an index with the same name
in the subtable?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:21:16AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it
> > isn't documented if it is?? I guess it's not really relevant is it?
>
> Oh, sorry, the command does not recurse. Should it? The whole CLUSTER
> thing does not recurse -- in fact that's why I didn't make the ALTER ...
> CLUSTER ON version do it, but maybe it should.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
> "El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer)
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-22 05:03:27 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-22 04:25:17 | Re: UltraSQL Win32 source code/patches? |