Re: ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON
Date: 2003-03-21 15:40:59
Message-ID: 20030321154058.GH3205@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:21:16AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it
> isn't documented if it is?? I guess it's not really relevant is it?

Oh, sorry, the command does not recurse. Should it? The whole CLUSTER
thing does not recurse -- in fact that's why I didn't make the ALTER ...
CLUSTER ON version do it, but maybe it should.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-21 15:41:54 Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-21 15:40:08 Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode