Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Date: 2003-01-31 23:51:49
Message-ID: 20030131185149.N24535@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:21:21PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> What do you mean with "compatibility addresses"? I don't know of
> any such thing.

I'm thinking of these sorts of things (my faviourite description,
from RFC 2893):

IPv6/IPv4 nodes that perform automatic tunneling are assigned
IPv4-compatible address. An IPv4-compatible address is identified by
an all-zeros 96-bit prefix, and holds an IPv4 address in the
low-order 32-bits. IPv4-compatible addresses are structured as
follows:

| 96-bits | 32-bits |
+--------------------------------------+--------------+
| 0:0:0:0:0:0 | IPv4 Address |
+--------------------------------------+--------------+
IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Address Format

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2003-02-01 05:35:15 Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2003-01-31 19:37:08 Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-02-01 00:26:27 Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-01-31 23:31:12 Re: not using index for select min(...)