Re: On file locking

From: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On file locking
Date: 2003-01-31 08:46:39
Message-ID: 20030131084639.GM12957@filer
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> But this only wins if a child process inheriting an open file also
> inherits copies of any locks held by the parent. If not, then the
> issue is moot. Anybody have any idea if file locks work that way?
> Is it portable??

An alternate way might be to use semaphores, but I can't see how to do
that using the standard PGSemaphores implementation: it appears to
depend on cooperating processes inheriting a copy of the postmaster's
heap.

And since the POSIX semaphores default to unnamed ones, it appears
this idea is also a dead end unless my impressions are dead wrong...

--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Barwick 2003-01-31 08:55:09 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-31 08:21:19 Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts