| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, raanders(at)acm(dot)org, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update on replication |
| Date: | 2002-12-18 03:00:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200212180300.gBI30at29162@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 21:33, Greg Copeland wrote:
> > I do agree, GBorg needs MUCH higher visibility!
>
> I'm just curious: why do we need GBorg at all? Does it offer anything
> that SourceForge, or a similar service does not offer?
>
> Especially given that (a) most other OSS projects don't have a site for
> "related projects" (unless you count something like CPAN, which is
> totally different) (b) GBorg is completely unknown to anyone outside the
> PostgreSQL community and even to many people within it...
I think gborg allows us to collect all relivant projects in one place.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-12-18 03:08:48 | Re: Update on replication |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-12-18 02:55:43 | Re: Update on replication |