Re: Update on replication

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, raanders(at)acm(dot)org, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update on replication
Date: 2002-12-18 03:09:46
Message-ID: 1040180986.1864.16.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 22:00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think gborg allows us to collect all relivant projects in one place.

Yes, but so would a webpage with a list of URLs, or a
freshmeat/google/dmoz directory, or an SF foundry, or [ any number of
other mechanisms for collecting groups of related websites ].

(Not to mention that you're assuming that GBorg includes "all relevant
projects" -- it doesn't do that now, nor is it likely to in the future.)

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-18 03:12:11 Re: Update on replication
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2002-12-18 03:08:48 Re: Update on replication