Re: get_bit etc.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brian Minton <bminton(at)efn(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: get_bit etc.
Date: 2002-12-05 04:38:08
Message-ID: 200212050438.gB54c8t20101@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


I have added documentation for all the bit/byte get/set functions, and
added a pg_description comment for each of them --- patch attached.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Brian Minton <bminton(at)efn(dot)org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> A documentation patch would be welcomed.
>
> > ok, how do I do that?
>
> Ideally, send a patch diff against the appropriate .sgml file in the doc
> source tree to pgsql-patches. If you're not up for patching SGML, write
> some plain ASCII text that would fit into the docs and send it to
> pgsql-docs; somebody will take care of marking it up in SGML and
> committing it where it belongs.
>
> > They are simple enough functions, and it was easy
> > to figure out what they did, but there is no mention of them, I guess
> > maybe they are "unofficial" functions.
>
> No, they're clearly intended as user-accessible functions. I'd say the
> author was too dern lazy to include any documentation when he submitted
> the code patch :-(. We have a lot of that disease goin' round.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 5.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2002-12-05 05:12:04 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-12-05 04:22:41 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group