| From: | Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Richard Pais <chris_pais(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon |
| Date: | 2002-11-18 16:07:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20021118160718.GD472@tishler.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_,
> hence FAQ.
Understood. That is why is said "for consideration."
> Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are
> working on a native port.
A Win32 native port in the 7.4 time frame is great news! However, I
hope that the Cygwin port will not be deprecated. There are compelling
reasons to still have a Cygwin PostgreSQL port just like there is with
Python, Perl, Vim, Emacs, etc. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind being
put out of the Cygwin PostgreSQL support business... :,)
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-11-18 18:18:07 | Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-18 16:04:33 | Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wheeler | 2002-11-18 16:16:03 | Re: DBD::PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-18 16:04:33 | Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon |