Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
Cc: Richard Pais <chris_pais(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon
Date: 2002-11-18 16:04:33
Message-ID: 200211181604.gAIG4XJ12099@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers

Jason Tishler wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_,
> > hence FAQ.
>
> Understood. That is why is said "for consideration."
>
> > Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are
> > working on a native port.
>
> A Win32 native port in the 7.4 time frame is great news! However, I
> hope that the Cygwin port will not be deprecated. There are compelling
> reasons to still have a Cygwin PostgreSQL port just like there is with
> Python, Perl, Vim, Emacs, etc. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind being
> put out of the Cygwin PostgreSQL support business... :,)

I see no reason to remove cygwin support. I assume they will both
continue to exist.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2002-11-18 16:07:18 Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2002-11-18 15:48:25 Re: make error during PostgreSQL installation on windows

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2002-11-18 16:07:18 Re: [HACKERS] ipc-daemon
Previous Message Thomas Aichinger 2002-11-18 15:45:19 Bug with sequence