| From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
| Date: | 2002-11-14 15:35:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200211142105.28396.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Thursday 14 November 2002 09:01 pm, you wrote:
> this is what it look like right now... looks like 69 MB of shared memory...
> ------ Shared Memory Segments --------
> key shmid owner perms Bytes nattch Status
> 0x0052e2c1 131072 postgres 600 69074944 19
Well, if you sample this figure for min/max/avg usage say for a day, you will
have sufficient idea as in what are your exact requirements are in terms of
shared buffers. I would say 5% more that would prove to be much more optimal
setting. IMO it's worth of experiement..
Just start out with pretty high to leave some room..
Shridhar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aurangzeb M. Agha | 2002-11-14 16:32:36 | Re: postmaster, but not pg_ctl -i -i |
| Previous Message | Henrik Steffen | 2002-11-14 15:31:29 | Re: [PERFORM] Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wei Weng | 2002-11-14 15:53:30 | Re: swapping? |
| Previous Message | Henrik Steffen | 2002-11-14 15:31:29 | Re: [PERFORM] Upgrade to dual processor machine? |