| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | luc neulens <luc(dot)neulens(at)acunia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: transactions |
| Date: | 2002-10-04 17:30:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200210041730.g94HULa25305@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, luc neulens wrote:
>
> > does any one know since when postgres supports transactions?
>
> For as long as I've been using it (since 6.5.x) and way before that I
> believe.
>
> Which reminds me, when Oracle was responding to the .org using postgresql
> issue they said that Postgresql doesn't support transactions. Did they
> even bother looking at the docs for Postgresql before spewing their lame
> crap??? Probably not.
They confused us with MySQL in that paragraph.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roland Roberts | 2002-10-04 17:35:31 | Re: [GENERAL] Fast Deletion For Large Tables |
| Previous Message | David Blood | 2002-10-04 16:46:57 | Pinning a table into memory |