Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...
Date: 2002-09-10 02:57:01
Message-ID: 200209100257.g8A2v1408725@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Hrm, I should go check the archives, but I thought what was used was
> one step below -C[fF] and was used because of size concerns for
> embedded databases. My memory for what happens on mailing lists seems
> to be fading though so I'll look it up.

I see in parser/Makefile:

FLEXFLAGS = -CF

and

ifdef FLEX
$(FLEX) $(FLEXFLAGS) -o'$@' $<
else
@$(missing) flex $< $@
endif

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-10 02:59:18 Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-09-10 02:56:22 Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...