Re: SET SCHEMA?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SET SCHEMA?
Date: 2002-08-27 19:25:23
Message-ID: 200208271925.g7RJPNk00808@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Can someone explain where we are on this? Is it a TODO item?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Would it be useful to implement the SET SCHEMA command from SQL92? (I
> > assume it's also in 99.)
> >
> > I guess that SET SCHEMA should change the front of the search path, so
> > that it would change the schema reported by current_schema(). It would
> > be a simplified form of SET SEARCH_PATH.
>
> Hrm - it would be sort of silly to launch an all-new standards-compliant
> schema support without it?
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-08-27 19:35:41 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-27 19:19:43 Re: Open 7.3 items