Re: Large file support available

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large file support available
Date: 2002-08-27 18:32:03
Message-ID: 200208271832.g7RIW3a28322@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > My point is that it seems fsetpos is the approved way of accessing large
> > files, rather than fseeko. In fact, I don't have fseeko here but I do
> > have fsetpos, and it does handle large files because my includes have
> > this:
> >
> > typedef off_t fpos_t
> > typedef quad_t off_t;
>
> Interesting. In general, you can't rely on fpos_t being an integral type,
> which indeed on my machine it isn't. But for pg_dump we need an integral
> type because we do offset arithmetic.

Oh, is that why fsetpos is always SEEK_SET and not SET_CURR or offset
stuff. Strange I don't have fseeko and do have large file support.
BSD/OS has had it for years. I guess they just do off_t arithmetic, but
that isn't portable.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-27 18:36:00 Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show /d+ /l+
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-08-27 18:27:17 Re: Large file support available