Re: lock listing

From: nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-31 18:47:49
Message-ID: 20020731184749.GA26784@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:34:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, I think that would be the way to go, or look at the stat functions
> that return tuple sets and use those. That may be a cleaner solution.

Why is that cleaner?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-31 19:10:10 Re: lock listing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-31 18:34:19 Re: lock listing