From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: lock listing |
Date: | 2002-07-31 18:34:19 |
Message-ID: | 200207311834.g6VIYJ801805@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Yes, I think that would be the way to go, or look at the stat functions
that return tuple sets and use those. That may be a cleaner solution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:11:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We have pg_stat_activity. Seems pg_locks should behave the same,
> > without the (). Let it show up in \dS. Do you need assistance with
> > this? I know FRS is neat, but logically it seems it should appear as a
> > table like that statistics stuff.
>
> So I should just add a view called "pg_locks" that calls the table
> function?
>
> I'll submit a new patch once Joe's anonymous composite type patch gets
> into CVS.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-31 18:47:49 | Re: lock listing |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-31 17:27:00 | Re: default attstattarget |