| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Date: | 2002-07-04 05:33:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200207040533.g645XIp00854@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > It may turn out to be a choice of client-cleanliness vs. backend
> > cleanliness. Seems Hiroshi already wins for client cleanliness.
>
> No, he only breaks even for client cleanliness --- either approach
> *will* require changes in clients that look at pg_attribute.
Uh, Christopher already indicated three clients, psql, pg_dump, and
another that will not require changes for Hiroshi's approach, but will
require changes for isdropped. That doesn't seem "break even" to me.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-04 05:39:31 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] pg_restore cannot restore function |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-04 05:32:06 | Re: libpq++ build problems |