Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: 2002-06-08 15:57:07
Message-ID: 200206081557.g58Fv7B12506@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >> Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
>
> > The utility of these programs is independent of the platform. If we think
> > pg_dumpall is not useful, then let's remove it.
>
> I have been seriously considering converting pg_dumpall to C anyway,
> because it's already *very* messy, and I don't see any reasonable
> way to make it support dumping per-database and per-user config
> settings. (Do you really want to try to parse array values in a
> shell script?)
>
> (I'd actually consider making pg_dumpall a part of the pg_dump
> executable; then it could invoke pg_dump as a subroutine call...)
>
> If Peter's got the time/energy to convert 'em all, I'm for it.

Yea, shame it will now take 15 lines of C code to do what we could do in
1 line of shell script but I don't see any other option.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-06-08 16:03:07 Re: [HACKERS] Schemas: status report, call for developers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-08 15:52:50 Re: Question whether this is a known problem in 7.1.2