Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication status

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication status
Date: 2002-05-30 12:22:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:08:21PM -0700, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> clients. We have been very low-key (imho) in representing this solution
> to the developer community, but it should be considered for applications
> matching its capabilities. 

I should like to emphasise that I have no desire to run down rserv --
I think it's pretty good, and I'm more than happy with its
performance.  That I'm now facing a feature-lust argument for ORAC is
a political, and not technical problem.   

> Full transactional integrity across primary
> and secondary servers is not easy to come by and not offered by most
> other solutions. 

Exactly, plus there appears to be a big price to be paid for that
full integrity.


Andrew Sullivan                               87 Mowat Avenue 
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>                              M6K 3E3
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alessio BragadiniDate: 2002-05-30 13:04:19
Subject: Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2002-05-30 10:13:13
Subject: Re: Null values in indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group