| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication status |
| Date: | 2002-05-30 12:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20020530082259.B27047@mail.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:08:21PM -0700, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> clients. We have been very low-key (imho) in representing this solution
> to the developer community, but it should be considered for applications
> matching its capabilities.
I should like to emphasise that I have no desire to run down rserv --
I think it's pretty good, and I'm more than happy with its
performance. That I'm now facing a feature-lust argument for ORAC is
a political, and not technical problem.
> Full transactional integrity across primary
> and secondary servers is not easy to come by and not offered by most
> other solutions.
Exactly, plus there appears to be a big price to be paid for that
full integrity.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alessio Bragadini | 2002-05-30 13:04:19 | Re: wierd AND condition evaluation for plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-05-30 10:13:13 | Re: Null values in indexes |