| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Ulrich Drepper <drepper(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug |
| Date: | 2002-05-26 03:32:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20020526003216.B12810-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Michael Meskes wrote:
> No, this is simply not true. The version number is what the upstream
> gives its release. No more no less. What RH does is becoming as subtly
> incompatible a possible. If that's the goal, it doesn't look like free
> software for me. Sure all changes are published, but why forcing this
> kind of difference between linux distributions? Why not calling it 2.2.6
> or something if there has to be some changes that are not compatible?
Or rlibc? :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-26 04:42:58 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-05-26 01:24:33 | Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug |